www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2003/03/06/15:05:57

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:05:41 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: uid > 64k
Message-ID: <20030306200541.GB10932@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3E675F8D DOT 414B9BBD AT ieee DOT org> <20030306164822 DOT GT1193 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3E6780A9 DOT F1F32899 AT ieee DOT org> <20030306171033 DOT GB7674 AT redhat DOT com> <3E678A49 DOT 707BF9D0 AT ieee DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3E678A49.707BF9D0@ieee.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:50:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Couldn't you just keep track of the uids and ensure that you didn't
>> duplicate any?
>
>Yes, absolutely.
>However there is no guarantee that users won't call separately mkpasswd -l 
>and mkpasswd -d, or another mkpasswd -d other_domain, or mkpasswd -d -u
>It would be desirable to return the same uid in all these cases.

But why not just record whatever is already in /etc/passwd?  Subsequent calls
are just going to be appending to it, right?

cgf

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019