www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/11/14/13:28:55

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3DD3EB49.6000306@netscape.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:28:25 -0500
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT netscape DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: later w32api package required to build cygwin
References: <3DD3E347 DOT 60703 AT yahoo DOT com>

Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Why isn't the cygwin build process using the winsup/w32api directory?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message-ID: <005f01c28bf4$78c172a0$78d96f83 AT pomello>
> From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Subject: Re: later w32api package required to build cygwin
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:42:43 -0000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>     charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I've been attempting to build cygwin1.dll from within Cygwin.
> 
> 
>>It fails because my installed /usr/include/w32api/winioctl.h (from the
>>w32api-2.0-1 package) is out of date compared to that in cvs
>>(winsup/w32api/include/winioctl.h).
> 
> 
> Bug report from me:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01532.html
> 
> I got no response. As I said in that message, I think it is a bug in gcc.
> 

IIRC, the new gcc has started to ignore system directory 
overrides (in addition to barfing out that stupid message). 
  Using -isystem instead of -I for including the local 
w32api dir might be the solution here, although I was just 
lazy and copied the header over to the system dir.

Cheers,
Nicholas

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019