Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:29:24 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	mingw-dvlpr AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Exception handling in gcc-3
Message-ID:	<20021108162924.GB32143@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	mingw-dvlpr AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net,
	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT WNT DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0211081100010 DOT 308-400000 AT algeria DOT intern DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.WNT.4.44.0211081100010.308-400000@algeria.intern.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:28:26AM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
>Hi Danny,
>
>i just had the time to look at the eh changes in gcc-3 for throwing
>exceptions across DLL/EXE boundaries.
>While the code works in 99% for cygwin and mingw it has one disadvantage
>for cygwin: The atom name is lost after a fork.

Why?

cgf

- Raw text -