Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:37:01 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
Message-ID:	<20020906163701.GL21699@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com> <1031329271 DOT 9096 DOT 49 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1031329271.9096.49.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:21:11AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 01:07, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except
>> for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent.
>
>I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage
>to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the first place.
>
>JM2c.

Good point.  Earnie, since you're a member of cygwin-developers, why did
you allow this to happen?

If you are not able to build cygwin to test your changes then you probably
shouldn't be on this list.

cgf

- Raw text -