Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:15:30 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
Message-ID:	<20020906171530.K1574@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020906150721.GA22183@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:07:21AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
> You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except
> for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent.
> 
> I also suspect that if there wasn't a hint of "cygwin" in the original
> message, more people would have said "well, maybe we should change".
> 
> However, I don't care enough to fight this one.
> 
> I've already patched cygwin so this is a non-issue as far as I am
> concerned.
> 
> If this is a big issue for anyone else then they should (and should have
> been) arguing along with me.  Apparently, the way to do that is to say
> "I agree with your position" multiple times, like Earnie seemed to do
> with every message.

I hope I made my position clear enough.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -