Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:02:38 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: vfork / setsid interaction
Message-ID:	<20020813160238.GA11009@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1029248291 DOT 12157 DOT 96 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D591779 DOT 6030906 AT hekimian DOT com> <20020813165230 DOT H17250 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020813153445 DOT GI9193 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020813153445.GI9193@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:34:45AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>If there is a problem with calling setsid in vfork and not having things
>correctly restored when vfork "returns", that should be pretty easy to
>fix.

Btw, if someone (Joe?) can provide a simple test case demonstrating the
problem I'll be happy to fix it.

cgf

- Raw text -