www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
Subject: | RE: committers? |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Date: | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 09:13:27 +1000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5E85@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>, |
<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> | |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3JNWi812450 |
It would help if my email parsed. > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Collins > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:23 AM > To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: committers? > > > Chris, > I'm confused. You have, on a fairly often basis, > lamented the fact that no-one other than you and Corinna > seems to take responsibility for reviewing cygwin patches and > changes. You seem to be indicating that you want more input > into cygwin. Yet when I do just that, on a patch that is > certainly not harmful (while maybe not optimal) (please insert) I find I've overstepped the mark.. > .I didn't > realise I was overstepping boundaries when I checked it in, > so I'd appreciate it if you could restate those so I don't do > so in future. > > >If one of the functions is obsolete, it should be deleted. > That means > >that the patch does *not* look good. It needs to be reviewed. > > Fine, back it out (as you did). That's not a big deal. Just > to be clear: I'm not upset that the patch was reverted, > simply confused. > > Rob > >
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |