Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:45:43 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Release 1.3.10 and then merge daemon code
Message-ID:	<20020213014543.GH28002@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020212192227 DOT GA27947 AT redhat DOT com> <074801c1b403$aa422e10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<074801c1b403$aa422e10$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:27:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>
>
>> After that, unless there are objections, I'd like to merge the daemon
>> code.  I haven't seen any significant complaints so it sounds like
>this
>> is a safe thing to do.
>
>I'll prepare an IPC free patch this weekend, time permitting (after
>setup, before libxml+libxslt).

Why IPC free?

I wouldn't bother with the patch.  Could you just tag and merge instead?
We can fix up any collateral damage afterwards.

cgf

- Raw text -