Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RFC: Strace mask mnemonics / ORing
Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:27:13 -0600
Message-ID:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKMEBLCHAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Would the addition of mnemonic support and/or ORing in the message filter
mask of strace be useful to people?  I'm thinking along the lines of:

  strace -m syscall+malloc+thread ....

I could see this being useful for setting up aliases etc and not having to
worry if you got the hex looked up and ORed correctly; but I'm sure there
are a lot heavier users of strace than me here, so I figured I'd ask if this
was a solution looking for a problem or if it would actually be worthwhile.

PS: I know Red Hat is still waiting on the copyright assignment to get my
last strace patch in (as am I), sorry about the delay.  We've had some
untimely personal tragedies at work and I haven't been willing or able to
press the issue.  I'll press a little today.

--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.

- Raw text -