Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 15 Sep 2001 23:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Matt <matt AT use DOT net>
X-Sender:	<matt AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: possible explanation for make hang
In-Reply-To:	<20010916020118.A30902@redhat.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.NEB.4.30.0109152304570.3759-100000@cesium.clock.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:58:30PM -0700, Matt wrote:
> >On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> >Out of curiosity, are you testing on Win95 950, 950a, or 950b? I remember
> >when I did QA, some API calls that did not work as documented on 950/950a
> >would work fine on 950b. If you can't find 950b specifically, testing on
> >win98 is almost equivelant (950b has the win98 "kernel", for the
> >mostpart).
> >
> >If you don't have 950b or win98 handy, I can try an example test
> >case if you have one compiled or in source.
>
> It doesn't really matter.  If it doesn't work on one system, it isn't
> useful.

Okay, I figured there was a reason win95 wasn't dropped altogether but
thought I'd mention it anyways. I'll let you know if I think of anything
else.


--
http://www.clock.org/~matt

- Raw text -