Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:40:51 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Quick testfeedback...
Message-ID:	<20010912204051.C26072@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1000334648.31768.33.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:44:07AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Also the code there is a little arcane.
>
>for example, the while loop on line 85 looks like it can only ever
>execute once - either it jumps to gotoit, or returns 0. So why a loop
>construct?

That could well be what we in the arcane software industry call "a
typo".  As you can see, in this case, the difference between a while and
an if is inconsequential.  The 'while' harkens back to earlier code.

In any event (no pun intended), I was not necessarily suggesting that
mutos should be used.  As I said, they are not general purpose enough
for that.

I based mutos on a couple of articles that I found on the web which
dealt with rolling your own critical section-like objects.  Maybe we
could use some of those techniques, someday.

cgf

- Raw text -