Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2001 23:04:29 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Quick testfeedback...
Message-ID:	<20010911230429.A1898@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F166 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F166@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 12:46:01PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>>-----Original Message----- From: Christopher Faylor
>>[mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
>>>Which is why I was so mystified and concerned about it.
>>
>>I wasn't saying that there were even errors, necessarily.  I thought
>>that there might have been some signal generated.  It could be a
>>harmless signal like SIGUSR1 or SIGCHLD or something.
>
>Ok, well I'm going to commit the critical section stuff - Jason
>apparently got the same segv with and without the patch.  And then
>we're good to go I think.

I don't think so.  We still have a mysterious signal, probably a SEGV
to worry about.

cgf

- Raw text -