Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3AF6E177.42A39A64@yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2001 13:55:03 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Cygwin Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.3.1 *is* slower
References:	<20010427160641 DOT A11039 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> It is true that 1.3.1 is slower than 1.1.8.  I benchmarked it on my NT 2K
> dual processor 300MHZ system.
> 
> A config.status --recheck in my gdb build directory takes a minute 1 second
> with 1.3.1, 52 seconds with 1.1.8, and 48 seconds with 1.1.5.
> 
> Not a very encouraging trend.
> 
> Anybody have any ideas?  This is usually a sign of an extra disk open somewhere
> but I don't see anything obvious.
> 

Hey Chris, what do your timings give you now?  Just curious if my
strrchr patch improved it.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -