Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3AF6D9CD.C97ADD78@yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2001 13:22:21 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Cygwin Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Parker, Ron" <rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com>
CC:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: fix for pthread_broadcast
References:	<E94FF01DFF6CD31186F4080009DC3615020285D8 AT nttwr2 DOT tower DOT bldgs DOT butlermfg DOT org>

"Parker, Ron" wrote:
> 
> > I can't make any guarantees about 1.3.3 since I don't know exactly
> > how stable 1.3.2 will be.  It would help if people would try snapshots
> > but of course no one does.
> 
> Does anyone think that snapshots would see more usage if setup were able to
> download and install them?  Would this be a worthwhile behavior?

Yes, I think it would be worthwhile.  Note that IMO only the
cygwin-inst-YYYYMMDD.tar.bz2 and cygwin-src-YYYYMMDD.tar.bz2 should be
allowed via setup.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -