Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:53:18 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org>
Subject:	Re: UNIX domain socket change breaks PostgreSQL (was Re: [CYGWIN] initdb fails)
Message-ID:	<20010418175318.E394@dothill.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>,
	Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org>
References:	<20010418164518 DOT B394 AT dothill DOT com> <20010418164828 DOT A30878 AT redhat DOT com> <20010418165809 DOT C394 AT dothill DOT com> <20010418172443 DOT A31159 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20010418172443.A31159@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 05:24:43PM -0400
Organization:	Dot Hill Systems Corp.

Chris,

On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 05:24:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:58:09PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:48:28PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>Which part of the patch caused the problem?
> >
> >If I only back out the select part:
> >
> >http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/winsup/cygwin/select.cc.diff?cvsroot=uberbaum&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
> >
> >then PostgreSQL is happy again.
> 
> I can't imagine how that could be.  That is a dummy socket.  It should
> have no effect on anything but cygwin.

By "cygwin" do you mean the DLL or any Cygwin process?  I wasn't explicit
but both postmaster and psql are Cygwin processes.

> I could believe that the change to AF_UNIX sockets would have an effect,
> though.  I've backed out that patch since it was ill-advised.

I will do a full cvs update, make clean, and make to verify that the
problem is fixed in the current CVS.  I'll report back tomorrow.

> Could you try putting back the select change and backing out the net.cc
> change?  I would be interested in seeing if that fixes things too.

This fixes the problem too which implies that it should be fixed in the
current CVS.

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering       Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp.               Fax:   +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:   http://www.dothill.com

- Raw text -