Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:01:38 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: uname -s question
Message-ID:	<20010222130138.N11175@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010222120933 DOT E449 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010222120933.E449@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:09:33PM -0500

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:09:33PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Does anyone use the information, that starts with the "_" in "uname -s"?
>For example on NT 4.0, I'm referring to the "_NT-4.0".
>
>My only "use" is to excise it during tests for Cygwin in things like
>the following:
>
>    autoconf (i.e. sh) scripts
>    bash scripts
>    makefiles
>    python scripts
>
>It is probably too late and quite naive to ask but...  Can this
>information be removed to facilitate testing for Cygwin?

I don't see why this is necessary.  It comes up repeatedly and the
extremely simple solution is to match on CYGWIN*.  Many other systems
use this convention.  For instance, look at gdb's configure.in or
configure.tgt script.  There is a 'hpux*' and a 'solaris*'.

The information *could* potentially be important.  Cygwin running on
NT is not the same thing as Cygwin running on 95.

cgf

- Raw text -