Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:10:33 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Sequential Patch Question
Message-ID:	<20001106121033.B2263@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<20001106115915 DOT M196 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<20001106115915.M196@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:59:15AM -0500

On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:59:15AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Is there an easy procedure to produce a patch that assumes that a pending
>one will be accepted?  For example, after I completed the setup cygdrive patch,
>I wanted to move on to enhancing mount --show-cygdrive-prefixes to display
>the mount mode.  I stopped because I realized that I would have problems
>creating the patch via cvs diff -up.  Any recommendations?  The answer,
>"Wait for the patch to be accepted (or rejected)," is fine too.

I don't know of any other way to do this other than doing a straight diff between
your patched version and the new version that you'd like for acceptance.

Either that or wait for approval, I guess.

cgf

- Raw text -