Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/09/01/16:22:52
Hi!
Saturday, 02 September, 2000 Chris Faylor cgf AT cygnus DOT com wrote:
>>something like that. snapshot taken from sourceware ( DLL build
>>2000-08-25-23:55-EST) shows the same behavior. currently, as a
>>workaround, i've applied this patch (that looks more like dirty
>>hack), just to make things work, but i think that such change can
>>likely broke something else. any comments?
CF> Yep. Sorry but the patch makes no sense. The only effect of calling
CF> proc_can_be_signalled over your change would be to wait for the
CF> signal handler thread to call 'SetEvent (wait_sig_inited)' in the
CF> unpatched version.
i've reproduced this under gdb and see that if i call
proc_can_be_signalled it won't do wait_for_me() but skip to
return ISSTATE(..), and process_state is zombie.
CF> If that is never happening, then there is something seriously wrong
CF> somewhere.
CF> Do you have a simple test case for this scenario, even if it takes
CF> a bunch of repetitions to trigger?
export CVS_RSH=/usr/local/bin/ssh1
export CVSROOT=:ext:cgf AT some DOT server:/some/path/
cvs co module
cvs status file_in_module
since i have my cvs tree already pulled, i use only last command, but
i presume you'll see "no children" diagnostics at checkout
Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
- Raw text -