Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:58:20 -0400
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: mount doesn't complain about missing "mount directory" any more?
Message-ID:	<20000613225819.A12800@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<20000613213415 DOT A20386 AT cygnus DOT com> <s1s66rdq93c DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To:	<s1s66rdq93c.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>; from fujieda@jaist.ac.jp on Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 11:39:51AM +0900

On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:34:15 -0400
>>>> Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> said:
>
>> It looks like mount does not complain about a missing mount point directory
>> any more although AFAICT the code is still there to do so.
>
>I can still observe mount without -f option complains about a
>missing mount point directory.

Ok.  I'm sorry.  I didn't remember that -f avoided the error.  Is this
new or has it always been like that?

Btw, it sure would be nice if you could do this:

mount c:/foo /foo
umount c:/foo	#doesn't work (but would be nice)
umount /foo	#work

If you have an idle moment it would be nice to add this functionality to
mount to make it behave more like the UNIX version.

(Hope you don't mind my subtle hinting)

cgf

- Raw text -