Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20000503153310.00dfdcc0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Wed, 03 May 2000 15:38:39 -0400
To:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>,
	"cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin-developers AT hotpop DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: /cygdrive/windows ?
In-Reply-To:	<20000503153040.A8469@cygnus.com>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000503151424 DOT 00df44f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<200005031743 DOT NAA26680 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20000503171211 DOT 3492 DOT qmail AT web117 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
	<200005031743 DOT NAA26680 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20000503144208 DOT A7580 AT cygnus DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000503151424 DOT 00df44f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 03:30 PM 5/3/00, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:18:05PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> >At 02:42 PM 5/3/00, Chris Faylor wrote:
> >>As far as /boot is concerned, I like the name, but I hate polluting the
> >>namespace.  We've already abrogated /cygdrive, so I was thinking that
> >>we should stick with that even though it doesn't make sense to refer
> >>to the windows directory as a "drive".
> >
> >True but there is DOS-style precedent.  One can map a fully qualified 
> >path to a drive with the "subst" command.  In this case, one is mapping
> >a directory to a drive and treating it as such.  On the hand, if you ask
> >me if I feel comfortable about propagating DOS-style conventions, that's
> >another story!;-)
>
>x: is not a device in the UNIX sense, though.  It's still a file-structured
>entity.
>
>cgf


Right.  My response came in "out of order".  I was responding to your comment 
about using /cygdrive for the windows directory, not the subsequent 
discussion of whether /dev is more appropriate than /cygdrive for this 
"connection" point.

My comment is pretty much an "incidental".  However, I do tend to agree with
DJ with regard to how the ability to change /cygdrive to some other name 
affects the overall usefulness of /cygdrive in the case you brought up.


Larry

- Raw text -