Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<200004261944.OAA13998@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: hybrid text/binary mount
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:27:24 EDT."
	<20000426152724 DOT D25220 AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:44:47 -0500
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>

Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> writes:
> 
> So, we'll be no worse off with raw PBM files than we are right now.
> This is obviously not 100% foolproof.  That may be a reason not
> to even consider it because it will make problems a lot harder
> to track down.

That was the caveat I was pointing out as well -- better the devil
you ... At least we can now control the behaviour in two predictable
ways -- mount and explicit binary/text mode I/O.

Jeffrey Juliano brought up the issue of Emacs' handling of text vs
binary. I think it's apples and oranges since text editors misreading
text vs binary is immediately evident to the user, but not so to
a say a program that converts one format to the other in a batch
mode.

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -