Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:00:03 +0400
From:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.029) S/N A0F2A05A
Reply-To:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
Organization:	DEO
Message-ID:	<3500.990716@logos-m.ru>
To:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
CC:	cygwin-developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re[2]: gcc-2.95/ July 5 snapshot
References:	<19990715132926 DOT A1102 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hi!

15 Èþëü 1999 Chris Faylor cgf AT cygnus DOT com wrote:

Sorry, if i'm giving wrong suggestions. But Suhaib's report looked
pretty much like gcc is using global headers such as dirent.h and
assert.h, instead of local ones from snapshot's newlib and winsup. If
$(updir) is incorrect (in case of building in source directory or any of its
subdirs) -- the result would be exactly as Suhaib's.

CF> What in the world does this have to do with the July 5 snapshot?  How
CF> does changing a variable in the Makefile fix a problem with compiling
CF> winsup?

CF> Just to reiterate: Everyone should be building their stuff in a separate
CF> directory, i.e., don't build winsup in the same directory as the winsup
CF> sources.

I think it should read "don't build winsup in the same directory as the
winsup sources and in any of its subdirectories" ? if srcdir == ./..
or ./../.. then updir would be incorrect too, as far as i understand.

Correct me, if i'm wrong.

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -