From:	corinna DOT vinschen AT cityweb DOT de (Corinna Vinschen)
Subject:	Re: egcs-1.1b
3 Oct 1998 02:50:17 -0700 :
Message-ID:	<3615EF00.288DBD8D.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@cityweb.de>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 981002182922 DOT 15933A-100000 AT modi DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Cc:	Geoffrey Noer <noer AT cygnus DOT com>, Christopher Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>,
	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com

Mumit Khan wrote:
> 
> Hi Corinna,
> 
> I tried this with bare egcs-1.1b (no patches), and still can't reproduce
> the problem. None of my patches affect this type of code, so I'm not sure
> where the problem lies. Can you try out the following code:
> 
>   #define NO_COPY __attribute__((section(".data_cygwin_nocopy")))
>   static const int NO_COPY foo = 99;
> 
> and see what happens?
> 
> Regards,
> Mumit

This works without error or warning. Is it possible,
that the problem is a result of my configuring for
  i586-pc-cygwin32?
  ^^^^

The same doesn't happen with `cc1plus' from cygwin cdkb20a1,
which seems to contain the patches and is configured for
  i386-pc-cygwin32
  ^^^^

I will now recompile egcs1.1b _with_ the patches and for
  i586...

Let's see, what takes place.

Corinna

- Raw text -