From:	ian AT cygnus DOT com (Ian Lance Taylor)
Subject:	Re: New import library format proposal.
16 Apr 1998 08:53:08 -0700 :
Message-ID:	<199804161546.LAA22622.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@subrogation.cygnus.com>
References:	<6h575d$3g0$1 AT tweedledumb DOT cygnus DOT com>
To:	cgf AT cygnus DOT com
Cc:	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com

   Date: 16 Apr 1998 11:12:45 -0400
   From: cgf AT cygnus DOT com (Christopher G. Faylor)

   I've been dreaming about this for a while, too.  Is there any reason,
   other than speed, that dlltool couldn't emit C code to generate its
   import library?  That would make this slightly easier to play with.

It would make it a lot harder to incorporate the dlltool functionality
into the linker.  The linker can't reasonably invoke the compiler.  It
leads into a lot of problems about locating the precise compiler to
use and the precise set of options to pass it.

Ian

- Raw text -