From:	ian AT cygnus DOT com (Ian Lance Taylor)
Subject:	Re: getopt?
9 Feb 1998 14:50:24 -0800 :
Message-ID:	<199802092249.RAA07090.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@subrogation.cygnus.com>
References:	<Eo4typ DOT 8rG AT bbc DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com
To:	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com

   From: cgf AT bbc DOT com (Christopher Faylor)
   Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 22:18:25 GMT

   This time, ld complained about the lack of a getopt_long in the "new"
   version of getopt.  The Berkeley version doesn't have anything like
   this, since it is, apparently, only an implementation of old-style
   single character processing getopt.

That's normal.  The GNU tools will use their own copy of getopt on all
systems.  Attempting to optimize this is a bad idea, unless you go to
some extra work to make sure the interface is correct.

The advantage of putting getopt in cygwin would be for non GNU tools.

Ian

- Raw text -