Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:17:06 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is it a valid C++ structure initialization?
Message-ID:	<20021129051706.GA24834@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<027401c294dd$65d31210$0201a8c0 AT sos> <20021127235758 DOT GA21457 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20021127235758.GA21457@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 06:57:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 06:50:10PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
>>Here is a test program (wich seems to me incorrect):
>>
>>struct asd {
>> int a;
>> char b;
>>};
>>
>>void f(int i, char c)
>>{
>> struct asd qwe = {
>>  a: i,
>>  b: c
>> };
>>
>>}
>>
>>The program compiles fine with gcc-3.2. Gcc 3.3 current snapshot reports:
>>test.cc: In function `void f(int, char)':
>>test.cc:11: error: too many initializers for `asd'
>
>Yes, they are incorrect.  They are using gcc extensions which are no longer
>supported in g++ apparently.  Even the C99 labelled initializers are not
>supported.
>
>So, we have to fix these.

Actually, on closer inspection, I'm not so sure.  I made a simple change
to gcc which seems to allow these and since the error is so strange I'm
wondering if this is really allowd.  I also found some warnings in g++
which seem to indicated that labeled initializers are allowed.

I think I'll inquire of the gcc mailing list.

cgf

- Raw text -