www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de> |
To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: question about objdump output format ? |
Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 21:18:39 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <005401c2067c$78fd1b00$651c440a@BRAMSCHE> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
Importance: | Normal |
In-Reply-To: | <20020528174402.GA2897@redhat.com> |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
> Regardless, basic patch management would dictate that you provide > patches against plain CVS. You shouldn't expect maintainers to apply > unrelated patches in order to check your changes in. > ... but the segfault patch is pending and the removing duplicate line patch makes no sense (in true it does not work) without th segfault patches. So what should I do ? The is a possibility, I can merge both patches and submit it as one, but this infringe a rule, that patches should cover only single issues because of easier testing, isn't it ? So should I merge the patches or what should I do ? Regards Ralf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |