www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: new cygwin package: cgoban |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
Date: | Sat, 4 May 2002 18:24:25 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5FB9@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Teun Burgers" <a DOT rburgers AT freeler DOT nl>, <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g448OeI07371 |
Get a new setup.exe from http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe. Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Teun Burgers [mailto:a DOT rburgers AT freeler DOT nl] > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:46 PM > To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: new cygwin package: cgoban > > > I see the original message has led > to quite some discussion and even a decree. > > What is the status on the upload? > My setup.exe seems to crash on an increasing > number of mirrors right after download > of setup.ini. This is the message: > > SETUP heeft een algemene beschermingsfout veroorzaakt > in module USER.EXE op 0004:00005ff0. > > (dutch for general protecting fault). > > Charles Wilson wrote: > > > Similarly, I don't like the restriction that all 'X'-based > packages go > > under XFree86/ on sourceware. We don't put inetutils underneath > > ncurses/. We don't put openssh under openssl/. > > And: > > > Further, if one accepts that there should be one tree for all X > > **clients**, you've never stated WHY that single tree must > be the same > > one used by the XFree86 packages. They aren't PART of > XFree86. They > > just USE XFree86. > > I couldn't agree more. Putting them under XFree86 strongly > suggests that the package would be part of XFree86, and that > is not the case. > > Teun Burgers >
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |