Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CD391B3.CA852C57@freeler.nl>
Date:	Sat, 04 May 2002 09:45:55 +0200
From:	Teun Burgers <a DOT rburgers AT freeler DOT nl>
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new cygwin package: cgoban

I see the original message has led
to quite some discussion and even a decree.

What is the status on the upload?
My setup.exe seems to crash on an increasing
number of mirrors right after download
of setup.ini. This is the message:

   SETUP heeft een algemene beschermingsfout veroorzaakt 
   in module USER.EXE op 0004:00005ff0.

   (dutch for general protecting fault).

Charles Wilson wrote:

> Similarly, I don't like the restriction that all 'X'-based packages go 
> under XFree86/ on sourceware.  We don't put inetutils underneath 
> ncurses/.  We don't put openssh under openssl/.

And:

> Further, if one accepts that there should be one tree for all X 
> **clients**, you've never stated WHY that single tree must be the same 
> one used by the XFree86 packages. They aren't PART of XFree86.  They 
> just USE XFree86.

I couldn't agree more. Putting them under XFree86 strongly suggests that
the package would be part of XFree86, and that is not the case.

Teun Burgers

- Raw text -