Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 3 May 2002 23:35:15 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new cygwin package: cgoban
Message-ID:	<20020504033515.GC32261@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3CCED93D DOT 5081E0A5 AT freeler DOT nl> <20020503114633 DOT A22456 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020503153327 DOT GF17660 AT redhat DOT com> <3CD2DF24 DOT 2010702 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3CD2DF24.2010702@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Similarly, I don't like the restriction that all 'X'-based packages go 
>under XFree86/ on sourceware.  We don't put inetutils underneath 
>ncurses/.  We don't put openssh under openssl/.

I wasn't really asking for debate.  You can feel free not to like it
but that is the way I would like to see things organized.

cgf

- Raw text -