Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CD297FD.931C9726@yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2002 10:00:29 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: rebasing new packages?!
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5FA9 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

Robert Collins wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason AT tishler DOT net]
> > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:52 PM
>
> > > As long as the required dependencies are easily satisfied:
> > > a) STL headers + any libs for gcc on cygwin (i.e. OOTB build for
> > > developers).
> >
> > Isn't a) already satisfied?
>
> Possibly. I'm simply setting expectations.
>
> > > b) STL headers + any libs for gcc -mno-cygwin (i.e. how I
> > build, and
> > > the documented release build on
> >
> > Is b) satisfied by the following?
> >
>     http://www.colomsat.net.co/freehost/ngiraldo/cppcygwin.html
>
> b) is an alternative approach to what I've already documented here. So
> it covers libstc++ aka libg++-3. I don't know how much of the STL that
> includes (see my earlier email).
>
> > > http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html).
> > > c) STL headers + any libs for a linux hosted cross-chain targeting
> > > mingw. I.e. how I expected Chris builds.
> >
> > I don't know how to satisfy c).
> >
>
> If a & b are satisfied with the libg++-3 library and headers, then c) is
> trivial.If not then someone needs to check it is doable.

As long as rules a && b are followed in rule c then c is doable.

Earnie.

- Raw text -