Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ITP: netpbm
References:	<87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <3CC998A6 DOT 3030104 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Organization:	Jan at Appel
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:42:11 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<3CC998A6.3030104@ece.gatech.edu> (Charles Wilson's message of
	"Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:12:54 -0400")
Message-ID:	<87it6dpm70.fsf@peder.flower>
Lines:	39
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2
	(i386-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> writes:

> Wonderful, please do.

Ok.  I've been away from email, as you noticed, and will be back
tonight (CET).

I'll have to consider if any big problems arise, because this mustn't
turn into a time sink.

> BTW, I have had a private version of netpbm, packaged in a
> 'setup-compatible' way, for some time now.  When I get home, I'll put
> my version somewhere that you can access; you may want to expropriate
> some of my patches...

Ok, I'd like to have a look.  What do these patches do, ie, (why)
can't they flow upstream?

> Also, which png have you linked against?  1.0.12, or 1.0.13?

1.0.13.

I'll change dependencies to libpng10, and will split the package into
netpbm, libnetpbm9, libnetpbm9-dev[el], simply mimicking what Debian
is doing; that should be enough?

I'll have to read up to the # binaries thing, the only thing I would
like to consider* is moving /usr/bin to /usr/bin/netpbm, but I'd
rather not.

Greetings,  
Jan.

* but only if there's a good reason because of broken filesystem and
  lookup support, and some sort of consensus (summary, anyone? :-)

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

- Raw text -