www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: attn cgf - single build integration |
Date: | Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:19:27 +1000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F2A@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Cygwin-Apps" <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3R1JZ624028 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Collins > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 9:50 AM > To: Cygwin-Apps > Subject: attn cgf - single build integration > > > Chris, > I'm approaching a point with libgetopt++ that I'll want > to roll it into setup. This will (obviously) affect the > single-build procress, so I'm hoping that you can confirm or > suggest alterations to my plan: > > I think that as a general purpose library, it should sit at > winsup/libgetopt++ or even a level above. However the binary > linked into setup.exe needs to be built knowing about setup's > String class (as opposed to the C++ standard basic_string). > > So here's my idea: > we put the library at winsup/libgetopt++ > we make a symlink in the source tree at cinstall/libgetopt++ > to ../libgetopt++ > > During configure time setup sub-configures libgetopt++ as a > static only library in cinstall/libgetopt++ > > In the future if any other programs want to start using it, > we make winsup subconfigure winsup/libgetopt++. > > What do you think? With setup moved, there is no current requirement to put libgetopt++ in the winsup tree, so I won't be doing the above. Of course, it's such a great library it should be there :}. Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |