Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CC9BB44.7080200@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:40:36 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
CC:	Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>,
	"Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>,
	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: ITP: netpbm
References:	<87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020426153847 DOT 02c89b08 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3CC9B130 DOT 1000309 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020426162650 DOT 02ca4db0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:

> At 04:03 PM 4/26/2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> 
>>As for the # of executables in the /bin directory, isn't there a limit
>>to the number of files and/or directory entries in any one directory on
>>win32?
>>
> 
> I remember something vague about the number of entries in a directory on 
> FAT (not FAT32) partitions but I'm not sure whether it applies to files,
> directories, or both (probably both).  Depending on what the restriction 
> is, this may be a good argument for being cautious of putting too much 
> stuff in bin.  Anybody remember more about this FAT limitation?


You can only have 512 entries in the ROOT directory of a partition. 
However, long file names take up more than one entry, so under VFAT this 
limitation is actually worse than in FAT.

However, directories other than the root are unlimited in size (except 
by your patience, and vision)

--Chuck

- Raw text -