Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup changes to build standalone
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F0E AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Organization:	Jan at Appel
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:42:00 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F0E@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> ("Robert
	Collins"'s message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:22:44 +1000")
Message-ID:	<87elh2rgvb.fsf@peder.flower>
Lines:	24
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2
	(i386-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version:	1.0

"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> writes:

> Sure. I'm not relying on gnu make features though.

Yes, then things get a lot more awkward.

> I'll have a look at some point. I actually find automake much less
> horrible that doing everything by hand. Anyway, this is off-topic here -
> unless you are objecting to setup being automakified?

No, it's rather off-topic, sorry.

> Ermm, most of my projects have much more than 10 lines just listing the
> source.

Yes, that's the price you pay when not using wildcards, but that can't
be avoided.  If you'd want to dist everything that's in cvs (ie,
CVS/Entries), there could be a way out of that listing.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

- Raw text -