Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: strange source packaging?
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:04:32 +1000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5EA4@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>, <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3L54ca22210

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:06 PM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: strange source packaging?
> 
> 
> Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
> 
> > Actually, if there's no opposition (hah!) I'll update the 
> > documentation to reflect the current situation (e.g. 3 
> styles) -- but 
> > I'd like to mark one of them as the preferred style for new 
> packages.  
> > Hopefully mine and robert's style. ;-)
> 
> 
> Okay, as promised: documentation.  If you don't want to unpack the 
> tarball and look at it, go here:
> 

Can we get a diff for the HTML page?

Rob

- Raw text -