Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:49:09 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygapp <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: strange source packaging?
Message-ID:	<20020418174909.B24044@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygapp <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020417210033 DOT GB20207 AT redhat DOT com> <49269 DOT 66 DOT 32 DOT 89 DOT 136 DOT 1019089317 DOT squirrel AT secure2 DOT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020418110943 DOT D24938 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3CBEDBBA DOT 5040000 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020418170631 DOT G29277 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3CBEE9DA DOT 7050005 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3CBEE9DA.7050005@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:44:26AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> BUT...having said all of that, I reiterate: I prefer the style 3 over 
> EITHER style 1 or style 2 -- and the question here seems to be "document 
> styles 1,2,3, or document 1,(!2),3 or (!1),2,3  So I win, regardless.  I 
> really don't have a horse in the 1,2 vs. 1,(!2) vs. (!1),2 race.  So, 
> I've made my argument for 1,(!2) but won't defend it; I'll wait for a 
> consensus to emerge and will document the result.

What about 1 and 2 being actually the same?  Except for "it would be
nice" to add a patch file?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -