www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:14:30 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: cygwin-doc ready for upload |
Message-ID: | <20020416031430.GC25464@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20020416030008 DOT 58433 DOT qmail AT web20002 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20020416030008.58433.qmail@web20002.mail.yahoo.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.23.1i |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:00:08PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >>I just checked the discussion about this, and you asked if someone was >>already maintaining newlib-man. I don't think I ever answered but the >>answer is "no". It looks like the man pages aren't even generated by >>newlib anymore. Instead there is a big info file generated by 'make >>info'. >> >>Any chance that this could be incorpoated into your distribution? The >>sources are already part of the cygwin package so there isn't any need >>to include them. > >OK, it sounds like I should: >1) incorporate newlib-man-20001118 into cygwin-doc, maybe after a >little sed that would put a "This doc is no longer being maintained; >try info" But, where would the user find the info file? It isn't in any distribution yet. Alternatively, you could just include the current newlib info files in the package. >2) work on something to break the current newlib texinfo into man pages There are packages to do this. Possibly gcc uses one already. >Either way, I'd rather go ahead with the cygwin-doc as-is and put it on >my documentation todo list. I don't want to be pushy but I would really prefer that you incorporate the newlib stuff via either 1) or 2) (2 preferred). I foresee confusion otherwise. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |