Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:06:52 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin port of Pine
Message-ID:	<20020416030652.GA25464@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0204121303330 DOT 1132-100000 AT MPC96> <3CB776EC DOT 3010902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0204131252030 DOT 94033-100000 AT goedel3 DOT math DOT washington DOT edu> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0204151913110 DOT 138924-100000 AT goedel1 DOT math DOT washington DOT edu> <20020416022241 DOT GB23681 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0204151951390 DOT 140401-100000 AT goedel1 DOT math DOT washington DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.OSF.4.44.0204151951390.140401-100000@goedel1.math.washington.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:00:33PM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
>*** Christopher Faylor (cgf AT redhat DOT com) wrote today:
>
>:) This gets my vote, but I do have to ask you if you are prepared for the
>:) ton of questions you'll undoubtedly get on the cygwin list about this.
>:)
>:) mail clients seem to generate a lot of questions.
>
>I think I am prepared to support this version of Pine. I've had lots of
>experience supporting Pine already. I also hope some of the questions
>relative to cygwin are already answered in the documentation included with
>this packaged version of Pine. I hope some people will read it :)

Does pine somehow automatically Cc people even if they've set both the
Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To?  I'd set both on my email but you still
sent me personal email.  If pine really does do this, I withdraw my
vote.  If you can't trust a mailer to correctly interpret email headers
then I don't think I want it in the distribution.

If this was actually a conscious decision to CC me after I went to some
effort to stop that, then, please don't do that.

cgf

- Raw text -