Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 22:43:46 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Now that the new setup is here...
Message-ID:	<20020410024346.GY23551@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008AC93 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3CB39CFA DOT 80101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020410021303 DOT GQ23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB3A252 DOT 4080206 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020410023605 DOT GV23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB3A67C DOT 3050808 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3CB3A67C.3050808@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Oooohhhh, NOW I get it.  I didn't understand that "verpat:" was a new 
>field in setup.hint, PARSED by upset.  It's perfectly clear in hindsight.

That's probably because, on rereading, my description didn't make that
clear.

>Nevermind my earlier comments.  Time for some sleep.

Ditto.

cgf

- Raw text -