Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 21:26:26 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?
Message-ID:	<20020410012626.GI23551@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008AC96 AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3CB393D6 DOT 4030405 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3CB393D6.4030405@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:22:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Now, this works, and upset/setup are happy (every binary package has a 
>"src" package) but it is hackish, ugly, and a pain to maintain.  Is 
>there a better solution?  (Or can we discard the psuedo-src packages 
>without repurcussion?  Won't upset be upset by the "bin without src" 
>problem?)

If it is upset I'll be upset.

It should be acceptable to have bin without source.

If it causes a problem, I'll fix it.

cgf

- Raw text -