Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 23:29:00 +0200
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
Reply-To:	"Gerrit P. Haase @ cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<127209722184.20020409232900@familiehaase.de>
To:	Christopher Faylor <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing
In-Reply-To:	<20020409142353.GA4071@redhat.com>
References:	<20020409142353 DOT GA4071 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hallo Christopher,

>>Could it be that setup cannot handle the version string "p4-1"? This
>>should be legal as far as I understand the Cygwin package
>>documentation, but then I might have misunderstood something. Should I
>>change the version string or should the setup maintainers look at
>>their parser again?

> Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which
> indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number?  It isn't as far as
> my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that.  I don't
> see any way to unambiguously parse something like that.

It is still dubious for me.
Setup was able to fetch it from the server during 'Download only' with
version number '1'.  But when doing an install from local directory it
wasn't offered anymore in the chooser.
IIRC Setup is able to install packages even if there is no version in
the name string (e.g. foo.tar.gz).


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

- Raw text -