Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 17:36:12 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing
Message-ID:	<20020409173612.E1127@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<15538 DOT 63178 DOT 55000 DOT 272674 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL> <20020409142353 DOT GA4071 AT redhat DOT com> <15539 DOT 104 DOT 987000 DOT 677306 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<15539.104.987000.677306@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:53:28PM +0000, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Christopher Faylor writes:
>  > Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which
>  > indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number?  It isn't as far as
>  > my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that.  I don't
>  > see any way to unambiguously parse something like that.
> 
> Well, then "but then I might have misunderstood something" applies and
> I'll have to change that. I've never understood what the 'P' is good
> for anyway in TEI's version numbers.

"Package"?  "Persion"?  Ok, ok...

In OpenSSH-3.2p1 it means "portable" to delimit from the plain
OpenBSD version, perhaps here it's something similar...

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -