www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:48:32 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing |
Message-ID: | <20020409142353.GA4071@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <15538.63178.55000.272674@gargle.gargle.HOWL> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.23.1i |
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +0000, Markus Hoenicka wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase writes: > > @ tei-xml > > sdesc: "The Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) XML DTD" > > ldesc: "The Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) XML DTD > > > > A large, modular, and flexible document type definition which is > > widely used in linguistic applications, although it is as well > > suitable for general-purpose documents. > > > > See http://www.tei-c.org/ for more information." > > category: Text > > requires: libxslt tei-xsl sgml-base xml-base > > [test] > > version: 1 > > install: contrib/tei-xml/tei-xml-p4-1.tar.bz2 29310 > > source: contrib/tei-xml/tei-xml-p4-1-src.tar.bz2 28189 > > > >Could it be that setup cannot handle the version string "p4-1"? This >should be legal as far as I understand the Cygwin package >documentation, but then I might have misunderstood something. Should I >change the version string or should the setup maintainers look at >their parser again? Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number? It isn't as far as my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that. I don't see any way to unambiguously parse something like that. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |