Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020409070053.49861.qmail@web13702.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 00:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Proprietary Software [WAS: Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing]
To:	Earnie Boyd <Cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	Markus Hoenicka <Markus DOT Hoenicka AT uth DOT tmc DOT edu>, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com,
	Earnie Boyd <Cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<3CB1E70A.BDC351B9@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
> Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Markus,
> > 
> > I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
> > 
> 
> Your proprietary software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any
> library compiled with Cygwin1.dll dependencies.  Your proprietary
> software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any library that is
> itself covered by the GPL unless special clauses are given such as is in
> the LGPL. 

well, these are few Perl scripts that we use internally, and the documentation
written in DocBook XML. It's no way a software for sale, nor a package which 
could be useful to anyone else, because it's really domain-specific. 

Am I right that in this case I'm free to use the GPL software 
without any license offence?

Thanks for pointing to the issue, it's a really thing to think about.

Ragards, 
Stanislav


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

- Raw text -