Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020408024858.18724.qmail@web14506.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:48:58 +1000 (EST)
From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Checksums [Was Re:fastcall]
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20020408013422.GA12297@redhat.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

 --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at
11:28:20AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> > --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002
> at
> >08:29:29AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:

> >If so, I am happy checking in windres patches.   The checksum
> >patch is a bit more intrusive into BFD-land and needs review. 
> 
> I asked DJ to reevaluate that one a week or so ago.  Have you tried it?
> If it just modifies pe-specific code, I'd say we should ping the author
> to
> see if he has any further tweaks (this patch has a two or three month
> history) and, if not, check it in.

I tried this version:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-01/msg00395.html
 and yes it works, without causing any new failures.

I haven't tried using it to build working device drivers though.

I have written to Caspar requesting that he refresh his patch on binutils
list.

Danny



http://www.sold.com.au - SOLD.com.au Auctions
- 1,000s of Bargains!

- Raw text -