Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: fastcall
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:54:00 +1000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008AC61@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Danny Smith" <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>,
	"cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g37Ms4o00574

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Smith [mailto:danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz] 
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:29 AM

> In order to get it into official sources, the ReactOS team 
> will need some support.

What sort of support can we offer? I'm happy to vouch that 'it works for
me'. We've been round this one before with the --auto-import patch after
all.
 
> For the fastcall to work, binutils support is also needed. 
> There is a big problem with binutils because of the vacuum 
> left by DJ stepping down as w32 maintainer.  There are 
> currently  bugs in binutils with respect to ld --shared (or 
> at least there was two weeks ago and has been since 17 [UTC] 
> December).  
> 
> Related frustrations:  ReactOs team has submitted several 
> relatively non-intrusive patches for useful windres 
> improvements that have not been seriously reviewed.  My patch 
> for --exclude-all-libs lingered into forgetfullness.  Ditto 
> for a ReactOs patch for checksums in pe-executables.

Which would be wonderful things to have.  
 
> Chris asked the question a while ago: "Wanna be a binutils 
> maintainer".

Are you asking if someone here can step up? I'd love to, but I suspect I
don't have the time to do a good job. I'm struggling to answer all
setup.exe related questions at the moment. Also, I think the issue is
needing the binutils w32 maintainer, not a cygwin port maintainer, and
frankly, I've no idea what sort of time commitment that entails. If
someone (perhaps DJ) can clarify that I'll consider stepping up for that
maintainership - on the basis of someone being better than no-one, even
if I'm a bit slow on response for them.

Rob

- Raw text -