Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are they called?)
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:30:28 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600AFDC2@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2K5WD330367

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM

> I don't see any reason to delay adopting XFree86 into the 
> main setup. So, lets not worry about customizing anything or 
> offering alternate setup.ini's.

I don't see any reason either, but then I've been pushing for this for
>6 months.

The reason I'm suggesting have a test setup.ini is so that their
install-script can be tested a little bit...

Rob

- Raw text -