Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<030301c1bbf1$f66967e0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>, <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<015a01c1b886$622561b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <VA DOT 00000a82 DOT 00e1d48b AT thesoftwaresource DOT com> <005701c1b8f0$0e3794f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <008901c1b8f8$b8d2afa0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <VA DOT 00000a93 DOT 01cf402a AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Setup
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:40:42 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	22 Feb 2002 22:39:49.0588 (UTC) FILETIME=[D60EA140:01C1BBF1]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Keener" <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Setup


> Robert Collins wrote:
> > And a complete fix is in CVS now.
> >
>
> I just tried setup from cvs and rebuilt and I still get the null file
on the
> last file I try to install from my local directory.  Actually it was a
> reinstall of zlib and it failed with the null error and then when I
went back
> into setup it showed it as a new install and when I selected to
install it - I
> still got the Null error.  I then went and did an install from the
internet and
> zlib showed as needing to be installed and then installed just fine.
>
> It might be something with my version since I did a full cvs update
but I
> didnot get the patch for test to default to keep if already installed.
That
> appears to have been applied to the branch and so I applied it to mine
> manually.  So maybe something else got skipped as well.

What TAG did you build from? setup200202 works fine for me, and doesn't
uninstall installed packages when test is selected. Like Chris I feel
the solution is wrong, but I can't articulate (yet) how the model is
wrong, and so I've followed the (apparent) consensus.

If you're looking at HEAD, bugfixes are going in there as well, but the
test mode behaviour is cosmetic IMO, as opposed to the silent failure
from local directories!

Rob

- Raw text -