Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:31:46 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: comments on texmf package?
Message-ID:	<20020117173146.V2015@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<m31ygpdk7q DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<m31ygpdk7q.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 05:18:49PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Probably I'm too impatient, but I've been waiting so long for a full
> tex setup in Cygwin...  Who will be looking at the new texmf packages?
> 
>     http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00311.html

I'm not at all familar with tex so I'd like to ask somebody else
to look into these packages.  The setup.hint files are looking ok to
me.  Did you pack using the correct paths as given on
http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents ?

Another point:  Aren't we still waiting for tetex-beta-20001218-3 
leaving `test' state or did I miss something?  IMO it doesn't make
much sense to have these texmf packages in `curr' state if they
depend on a `test' package.

Opinions?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -